Health Topics
Efficacy Chart
Online Birth Control Education
Efficacy
A birth control method's effectiveness is estimated based on the percentage of women who experience an unintended pregnancy in one year using a particular method. This may also be stated as a method's failure rate: the percentage of women experiencing pregnancy during a one year period of method use.
Two rates are reported for each method of birth control: the theoretical rate (or perfect) and the actual user (or typical) rate. The theoretical rate estimates how well a method performs when used as intended and consistently by "perfect" users. The actual (typical) user rate estimates how well a method performs when all of the errors and problems that people typically encounter with a method are taken into account.
Failure Rates of Birth Control Methods
Method |
% of Women Experiencing an Unintended Pregnancy within the First Year of Use |
|
|---|---|---|
Typical Use |
Perfect Use |
|
| No Method | 85 |
85 |
| Spermicides | 29 |
18 |
| Withdrawal | 27 |
4 |
| Fertility Awareness-Based (FAB) Methods | 25 |
N/A |
| • FAB: Standard Days Method | N/A |
5 |
| • FAB: TwoDay Method | N/A |
4 |
| • FAB: Ovulation Method | N/A |
3 |
| Contraceptive Sponge | ||
| • never given birth before | 16 |
9 |
| • previously given birth | 32 |
20 |
| Diaphragm | 16 |
6 |
| Condom | ||
| • Female Condom (Reality) | 21 |
5 |
| • Male Condom | 15 |
2 |
| Combined Pill and Minipill | 8 |
0.3 |
| Evra Patch | 8 |
0.3 |
| NuvaRing | 8 |
0.3 |
| Depo-Provera | 3 |
0.3 |
| Intrauterine Device (IUD) | ||
| • IUD: ParaGard (copper T) | 0.8 |
0.6 |
| • IUD: Mirena (LNG-IUS) | 0.2 |
0.2 |
| Implanon | 0.05 |
0.05 |
| Female Sterilization | 0.5 |
0.5 |
| Male Sterilization | 0.15 |
0.10 |
Emergency Contraceptive Pills: Treatment initiated within 120 hours after unprotected inercourse reduces the risk of pregnancy by 75%-89%.
Online Birth Control Education |
|
| Previous Topic: <Choosing A Method < |
Next Topic: > Methods of Contraception > |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
last reviewed: Spring 2005